in

Epic Games ruled in lawsuit alleging Apple’s monopoly


Epic Games filed notice appealing a federal judge’s decision in a lawsuit alleging that Apple is running an illegal monopoly that stifles competition.

Epic Games filed the notice that is appealing a federal judge’s decision in a lawsuit alleging that Apple is running an illegal monopoly that stifles competition.

The creator of the popular Fortnite video game said in a court filing on Sunday that it would take the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

In a 185-page ruling delivered Friday, US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ordered Apple to break down a lucrative portion of the competing barricade guarding its close iPhone App Store, but dismissed Epic’s allegations that Apple runs a monopoly.

Epic’s notice of appeal said it would appeal the final decision “and all orders leading to or causing that decision.”

The ruling continues to dispel the so-called “walled garden” that Apple has built around its crown jewel, the iPhone, and its App Store, without toppling it entirely.

The decision also provided some retaliation for Apple. The judge did not brand Apple as a monopoly or require competing stores to offer apps for the iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch.

Those were two of the biggest motives sought by Epic, which it hoped would be a historic antitrust case last year after defying a special payment system that allowed all of Apple’s in-app digital transactions on iPhones. Funnels 15% to 30% of the .

While parts of his decision raised questions about whether Apple’s fees were driving up prices for consumers, Gonzalez Rogers upheld the fee structure and urged the company to stop other stores from offering apps for its iPhones. retained the right. He sided with Apple on every other important point of the matter.

But the judge concluded that Apple had been engaging in unfair competition under California law, ordering the company to allow developers across the US to insert links to payment options other than iPhone apps. That change would make it easier for app developers to avoid paying Apple’s commission, potentially hitting billions of dollars in revenue annually.

Apple did its best to frame the decision as an outright victory, even as it acknowledged it could appeal part of the ruling that made it easier for app developers to turn away Apple’s commission. will make

————

Krischer reported from Detroit.

.



Source link

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lauer takes number 6; The Brewers hit 5 HR en route to 11-1

McPherson’s 33-yard kick in the OT lifts the Bengals up on the Vikings