in

Trump Organization CFO surrenders ahead of expected fee


Weiselberg was seen walking with his lawyer around 6:20 a.m. in a courthouse in lower Manhattan.

New York prosecutors are expected to announce the first criminal indictment Thursday in a two-year investigation into Trump’s business practices, accusing his famed company and Weiselberg of tax offenses related to fringe benefits for employees.

Charges against the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer, Alan Weiselberg, were sealed Wednesday night, according to two people familiar with the matter, but were to be unveiled before an afternoon appearance in a state court in Manhattan.

People were not authorized to speak about the ongoing investigation and did so on condition of anonymity.

There was no indication that Trump himself would be charged at this stage of the investigation, pursued jointly by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both Democrats.

Trump did not respond to shouted questions from reporters about the New York case as he visited Texas on Wednesday, but earlier in the week, Republicans called New York prosecutors “rude, nasty and completely biased.” and said that his company’s actions were “standard practice throughout the American business community, and not a crime in any way.”

People familiar with the matter told the AP that the planned fee was linked to benefits offered to the company’s top executives, such as use of apartments, cars and school tuition.

Messages seeking comment were left with Trump Organization spokesman and lawyers. Weiselberg’s attorney, Mary Mulligan, declined to comment. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office declined to comment.

Vance, who stepped down at the end of the year, is conducting a comprehensive investigation into various cases involving Trump and the Trump Organization.

Her office has taken note of the truth in the valuation and tax assessment of the company’s assets, among other matters, of the money Trump paid to women.

Vance fought a long battle to obtain Trump’s tax records and is submitting documents and interviewing company executives and other Trump insiders.

James hired two lawyers from his office to work with Vance’s team after his office found evidence of possible criminal wrongdoing while conducting a separate civil investigation of Trump.

Weiselberg, 73, had come under scrutiny, in part, after questions were raised about his son’s use of the Trump apartment for little or no cost.

Barry Weiselberg, who manages a Trump-run ice rink in Central Park, testified in a 2018 divorce statement that the Trump Parc East apartment was a “corporate apartment, so we didn’t have rent.”

Barry’s ex-wife, Jane Weiselberg, is cooperating with the two inquiries and the investigators have been exposed to tax records and other documents.

The case against Alan Weiselberg—a loyal lieutenant of Trump and his real estate-developer father, Fred—could give prosecutors a means to pressure the executive to cooperate and tell him what he knows about Trump’s business dealings What knows

The Trump Organization is the business entity through which the former president manages many of his entrepreneurial affairs, including his investments in office towers, hotels and golf courses, his many marketing deals, and his television business. Trump’s sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, have been in charge of the company’s day-to-day operations since becoming president.

Although Trump is not expected to be charged on Thursday, the charges against the company named after him raise questions about his knowledge — or the businesses involved — that prosecutors suspected were illegal.

Such allowances would not be considered taxable income, if they were required as a condition of employment, such as providing an apartment for the convenience of an employee, who is required to be at the office or workplace at odd or consecutive hours, or permitting the use of the car for commercial purposes.

Another prominent New York City real estate personality, the late Leona Hemsley, was convicted of tax fraud in a federal case resulting from paying her company to remodel her home without reporting it as income. Had happened.

The Trump Organization case involves a possible violation of New York state tax laws.

“The IRS regularly looks for abuses of fringe benefits when auditing closely held businesses,” Repetti said. “The temptation for the business is that it claims a tax deduction for the expense, while the recipient does not report it in the income.”

.



Source link

What do you think?

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0
null

With so few virus deaths, Australians debate vaccine risks

5a1ef51d02cacee08d5fc57f614cff72

over 65? This New Deficiency Puts You at “Increased Risk”